Life Cycle Assessment of Illuminants - A Comparison of Light Bulbs, Compact Fluorescent Lamps and LED Lamps

Mis en ligne par markusbeck
Contact: 
Prof. Matthias Finkbeiner, TU Berlin, Germany (Chair), Associate Professor Stig Olsen, Danmarks Tekniske Universitet Copenhagen (LCA methodology), Prof. Jens Hesselbach, Limón GmbH (energy expertise, LCA methodology).
Type: 
ACV complète disponible sur le web
Comparative: 
oui
Année de publication: 
2009
Langue: 
Anglais
Code: 
Lights
Produit: 
LED Lamps (OSRAM) Parathom A55 with Golden Dragon LEDs
Impacts environnementaux
Impact(s) des matières premières: 
Acidification
Changement climatique
Epuisement des ressources naturelles
Eutrophisation
Toxicité / Eco-toxicité
Niveau d'impact des matières premières: 
Moyen
Impact(s) de fabrication: 
Acidification
Changement climatique
Niveau d'impact de la fabrication: 
Moyen
Impact(s) du transport: 
Changement climatique
Eutrophisation
Niveau d'impact de la distribution: 
Faible
Impact(s) d'utilisation: 
Acidification
Changement climatique
Eutrophisation
Niveau d'impact à l'utilisation : 
Faible
Impact(s) de fin de vie: 
GŽnŽration de dŽchets
Niveau d'impact en fin de vie : 
Faible
Sources et qualité
Qualité de l'étude: 
ACV détaillée
Revue Critique?: 
Oui
Cohérence avec la série de normes ISO 14040/44?: 
Oui
Nom(s) du(des) commanditaire(s): 
Siemens Corporate Technology, Center for Eco Innovations, OSRAM
Nom(s) du(des) commanditaire(s): 
OSRAM Opto Semiconductors
Type du(des) commanditaire(s) : 
Entreprise
Nom(s) de(s) auteur(s): 
Siemens Corporate Technology, Center for Eco Innovations, OSRAM
Nom(s) de(s) auteur(s): 
OSRAM Opto Semiconductors
Type de(des) auteur(s): 
Entreprise
Objectifs et frontières du système
Unité fonctionnelle: 
Life Cycle Assessment of Illuminants (Light-emitting diode lamps)
Objectifs, hypothèses et limites: 
The overall Goal was to investigate what environmental impact lamps of three categories (incandescent lamps, compact fluorescent lamp and light-emitting diode lamp) have over their entire life cycle and how they rank in comparison to each other. The life cycle was broken down in (1) Raw material production, (2) manufacturing & Assembly, (3) Transport, (4) Use and (5) End of Life, whereas the results lead to conclusions mainly on resource consumption and primary energy input. In addition to the primary energy demand as key performance indicator, six environmental impact categories were applied to assess their impact on air, soil and resources including acidification potential, eutrophication potential, global warming potential, photochemical ozone creation potential, human toxicity potential and abiotic depletion potential. To ensure the comparability of the three different lamp types, a lifetime of 25,000 hours and a light output between 345 and 420 lumen during their whole lifetime were taken as a reference parameter. The location of use phase as well as the end of life was determined to be in Europe. The assessment was carried out in compliance with ISO 14040 and ISO 14044 and was critical reviewed by an independent review panel.

For the Light emitting diode (LED) lamps, less than 2% of the total energy demand is needed for their production. 

LED lamps demonstrate nearly identical impacts on the environment as fluorescent lamps (CFL), whereas both types save up to 80% of energy in comparison with a conventional light bulb. 

Since the efficiency of LEDs continue to increase, future energy savings and less environmental impact as well as better LCA results will be expected. 
According to the Life Cycle Assessment of Illuminants,  LED lamps are among the most environmentally friendly lighting products. 

Poster un nouveau commentaire

Le contenu de ce champ sera maintenu privé et ne sera pas affiché publiquement.




Commentaires récents


Utilisateurs en ligne

Il y a actuellement 1 utilisateur et 2 invités en ligne.

Nouveaux membres

  • nicolae
  • oryth
  • victor.kouloump...
  • steven520
  • BALLANGER